Documentary: The South Bank Show: The World of Jeff Koons (ITV 13th December 1992, 60mins) Editor: Melvyn Bragg
Didn't make the art work himself - hired skilled craftsmen
Is the aspect of being an artist to break the rules?
The boundary between what is good and bad. What is quality? When bad becomes good?
Relating to the postmodernist theory of Binary Oppositions
“According to Derrida, it has been a
characteristic of the western philosophical
and scientific tradition since the classical
times to think in binary oppositions.”
He left art school to live amongst society not in the world of 'art student community' to experience the 'real' world so to speak.
He found painting too subjective, he wanted to do something more objective.
Working with things in the real world - he wouldn't manipulate the object just display them. (The New Hoover Convertibles, New Shelton Wet/Drys 5-Gallon, Double Decker)
He took something that was already existing and put it into a different concept.
This relates back to Marcel Duchamp and his 'ready-mades' - The Fountain and the Bicycle wheel on top of a stool - Bicycle Wheel (1913).
The ideas of Duchamp were taken a step further in the mid eighties by Koons.
The traditions of an artist having no money and having to survive on what they had, making their materials with what they had was 'abolished' (if I can use that word to describe what Koons did).
Living in the real world, a mass produced teleological advancing world, Koons picked up on this fact and therefore reflected this in his work by using fabricators and highly expensive materials.
He made people look at the strange upside down world for the first time - basically rubbed our noses in it!
He managed to maintained the integrity and morality about art.
Some may looked at his art very perversely. Take for example the 'Rabbit'. ("Rabbit" Jeff Koons 1986). Stainless Steel 41 x 19 x 12 inches. Here he took something soft and inflatable and made it ridged and impermeable with its wrinkles (so to speak as a balloon animal would be).
Rational with the irrational
He made people try to trust their intuition and understand the past in order to ace pt his work.
Another reason for choosing craftsmen to produce his work was for the public to gain a sense of familiar-ness - so they didn't feel distance from the work.
He was in control of his work like Disney would hire someone to produce a Mickey Mouse statue at Disney World.
The symbols of banality (something that is trite, obvious, or predictable; a commonplace) in Jeff Koons' work flys in the face of the Modern movement. During the period extending roughly from the 1860s to the 1970s, and denotes the style and philosophy of the art produced during that era. Decorative (one word to describe it)
“Modernism is a trend of thought that affirms the
power of human beings to create, improve, and
reshape their environment, with the aid of scientific
knowledge, technology and practical
experimentation, and is thus in its essence both
progressive and optimistic.”
His works:
'Michael Jackson and Bubbles', (1988. Ceramic) shows purity and the feeling of being untouchable.
Some people liked this for perverse reasons.
'Puppy' 1992 12m high made of live flowers with steel structure beneath.
Koons said this piece was about generosity and spiritual in meaning.
The undomesticated puppy in front of a baroque setting makes the public feel like they're in Disneyland.
I feel a new name for Koons should be Walt Koons! - creating his own kitsch Disney world.
Ilona on top (Rose Background) (1990) - Cicciolina with Jeff Koons
The image is very objective on a subjective background. Maintaining onto the aspects of romanticism, holding onto many qualities seen in romantic painting.
Another 'fact' within this painting (relating to its trueness) was that Jeff Koons was actually in that position in real life. In this he translated human activity (mostly seen as personal perhaps crude and vulgar and not art!) into a romantic, tranquil, Utopian reflection.
Koon's work is sentimental flat out!
He was an artist which understood art of his time. He was able to leap ahead with prosperity.
The construction of his ideas gave the mass produced culture an iconic push so to speak. Ending the 20th Century.
Tuesday, 16 November 2010
Monday, 15 November 2010
Bourriaud
'Human society is structured by narratives, immaterial scenarios, which are more or less claimed as such and are translated by lifestyles, relationships to work or leisure, institutions and ideologies. Economic decision-makers project scenarios onto the world market.' (Bourriaud 2002:45)
'By manipulating the shattered forms of the collective scenario, that is, by considering them not indisputable facts but precarious structures to be used as tools, these artists produce singular narrative spaces which their work is the mise-en-scene (visual theme)'(Bourriaud 2002:46)
Discuss Koons work in these terms, how he shatters the sense of reality to create his visual theme so to speak.
'By manipulating the shattered forms of the collective scenario, that is, by considering them not indisputable facts but precarious structures to be used as tools, these artists produce singular narrative spaces which their work is the mise-en-scene (visual theme)'(Bourriaud 2002:46)
Discuss Koons work in these terms, how he shatters the sense of reality to create his visual theme so to speak.
Sunday, 14 November 2010
Lyotard's arguements with duchamp
Belsey, Catherine. 2002. Post structuralism. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
"Realism, Lyotard argues, protects us from doubt" (Belsey.2002:102)
"The postmodern, or the avant-garde, refuses to conform to pre-exisiting rules. (Give example here)
http://www.imprint.co.uk/Art/jcsmainframe.html
The Emergence of Art and Language in the Human Brain
Erich Harth, Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244- 1130 USA. Email: erich_harth@prodigy.com
'Our brains are characterized by sensory pathways that are highly reflexive, allowing higher cortical centres to control neural activity patterns at peripheral sensory areas. This feature is characterized as an internal sketchpad and involves recursive interactions between central symbols and peripheral images. The process is assumed to be the fundamental mechanism underlying most cognitive functions. The paper attempts to portray the beginnings of art and language as natural extensions of these pre-existing internal processes, made possible by the greatly enlarged human prefrontal cortex. It views these highly social activities as originating in subjective, private discourse between the emerging self and its externalized expressions.'
Instead Lyotard argues, 'the postmodern artist or writer are working without rules, in order to discover what rules governing their work will have been. The Postmodern is both too early and too late: to early for the public, since it must be new and too late for the author who cannot know in advance whether it will prove to be intelligible, pleasurable, or absurd.'
[Relate to Koon's case here - bring in cultural thoughts on his work]
Lyotard put forward a strong plea for continued artist dissent (dissent is a sentiment or philosophy of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea) He argued "Cultures need the challenge of new forms if they are not to settle into complacency or worse, terror". (Belsey 2002:100)
Realism offers us a picture of the world, in a way a safe guard from all the uncertainties in life and art. In the process of realism we can affirm the subjects and images we see as true.
Postmodernity in Lyotard's account specifies a different literary and artistic mode rather than a particular period.
Duchamp's challenge to realism is the intelligible (coherent / understandable) as postmodern. In my eyes he thrusted realism into our faces. People wanted art to be true to realism and overly subjective in order to 'accept' it. So what did Duchamp do? He produced something which was very 'real', showed the audience a true object of everyday....the urinal.
In the production of 'the Fountain' , a reproduced photographic work of Richard's Mutts urinal was when it all came down to it...ready made. So is this why this work was accepted...because it was 'culturally relative'?
"Realism, Lyotard argues, protects us from doubt" (Belsey.2002:102)
"The postmodern, or the avant-garde, refuses to conform to pre-exisiting rules. (Give example here)
http://www.imprint.co.uk/Art/jcsmainframe.html
The Emergence of Art and Language in the Human Brain
Erich Harth, Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244- 1130 USA. Email: erich_harth@prodigy.com
'Our brains are characterized by sensory pathways that are highly reflexive, allowing higher cortical centres to control neural activity patterns at peripheral sensory areas. This feature is characterized as an internal sketchpad and involves recursive interactions between central symbols and peripheral images. The process is assumed to be the fundamental mechanism underlying most cognitive functions. The paper attempts to portray the beginnings of art and language as natural extensions of these pre-existing internal processes, made possible by the greatly enlarged human prefrontal cortex. It views these highly social activities as originating in subjective, private discourse between the emerging self and its externalized expressions.'
Instead Lyotard argues, 'the postmodern artist or writer are working without rules, in order to discover what rules governing their work will have been. The Postmodern is both too early and too late: to early for the public, since it must be new and too late for the author who cannot know in advance whether it will prove to be intelligible, pleasurable, or absurd.'
[Relate to Koon's case here - bring in cultural thoughts on his work]
Lyotard put forward a strong plea for continued artist dissent (dissent is a sentiment or philosophy of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea) He argued "Cultures need the challenge of new forms if they are not to settle into complacency or worse, terror". (Belsey 2002:100)
Realism offers us a picture of the world, in a way a safe guard from all the uncertainties in life and art. In the process of realism we can affirm the subjects and images we see as true.
Postmodernity in Lyotard's account specifies a different literary and artistic mode rather than a particular period.
Duchamp's challenge to realism is the intelligible (coherent / understandable) as postmodern. In my eyes he thrusted realism into our faces. People wanted art to be true to realism and overly subjective in order to 'accept' it. So what did Duchamp do? He produced something which was very 'real', showed the audience a true object of everyday....the urinal.
In the production of 'the Fountain' , a reproduced photographic work of Richard's Mutts urinal was when it all came down to it...ready made. So is this why this work was accepted...because it was 'culturally relative'?
Thursday, 11 November 2010
METANARRATIVES
In postmodern philosophy, a metanarrative is an untold story that unifies and totalizes the world, and justifies a culture's power structures. Metanarratives are not usually told outright, but are reinforced by other more specific narratives told within the culture
Jean Baudrillard - hyperreality
Simulacra and Simulation is a philosophical treatise by Jean Baudrillard
Baudrillard claims that modern society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that the human experienceis of a simulation of reality rather than reality itself.
Baudrillard suggests that the world we live in has been replaced
by a copy world, where we seek simulated stimuli and nothing
more.
“…his postmodern universe is one of hyperreality in which entertainment,information, and communication technologies provide experiences more intense and involving than the scenes of banal everyday life, as well as the codes and models that structure everyday life. The realm of the hyperreal (relates to Jeff Koon's Play-Doh and Balloon Animals)is more real than real, whereby the models, images, and codes of the hyperreal come to control thought and behavior…
From the celebration series...
Play-Doh, 1995-2004, Oil on canvas. 334x282.2cm
A Balloon Dog, 1994-99, high chromium stainless steel with transparent colour coating. 307.3 x 363.2 x 11.3cm
This group of work known as the 'Celebration' series represents individual objects close up. Realized in hyperrealist style, the images linked to childhood seem to invade the viewer's visual space and communicate an engrossing and joyful universe (particularly reflected in the Play-Doh work)
…In other words, an individual in a postmodern world becomes merely an
entity influenced by media, technological experience, and the hyperreal…”
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/baudrillard/
Baudrillard claims that modern society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that the human experienceis of a simulation of reality rather than reality itself.
Baudrillard suggests that the world we live in has been replaced
by a copy world, where we seek simulated stimuli and nothing
more.
“…his postmodern universe is one of hyperreality in which entertainment,information, and communication technologies provide experiences more intense and involving than the scenes of banal everyday life, as well as the codes and models that structure everyday life. The realm of the hyperreal (relates to Jeff Koon's Play-Doh and Balloon Animals)is more real than real, whereby the models, images, and codes of the hyperreal come to control thought and behavior…
From the celebration series...
Play-Doh, 1995-2004, Oil on canvas. 334x282.2cm
A Balloon Dog, 1994-99, high chromium stainless steel with transparent colour coating. 307.3 x 363.2 x 11.3cm
This group of work known as the 'Celebration' series represents individual objects close up. Realized in hyperrealist style, the images linked to childhood seem to invade the viewer's visual space and communicate an engrossing and joyful universe (particularly reflected in the Play-Doh work)
…In other words, an individual in a postmodern world becomes merely an
entity influenced by media, technological experience, and the hyperreal…”
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/baudrillard/
The DISTANCE between LIFE and ART
Koons does not alter the context or modify the image but often allows their transposition into the artistic field to bring out their singularity and paradoxical (self-contradictory eg standing is more tiring than walking) qualities.
Good comparison here would be Warhol - as he does change the context (Marilyn Monroe and Campbell's soup cans)
Koon's work plays on contrast and not just iconographically.
Example his choice in material overturns the rules generally associated with the idea of art. With plastic flowers, kitsch china figurines and gigantic stainless steel toy animals - his work looks like over sized furnishings - seems like he wanted to confuse art with decoration.
Seeks to efface the mental boundaries of art, he also distances himself away from the craftsmanship of the 'meaning' of art by employing numerous assistants and commissioning works from specialized factories.
Good comparison here would be Warhol - as he does change the context (Marilyn Monroe and Campbell's soup cans)
Koon's work plays on contrast and not just iconographically.
Example his choice in material overturns the rules generally associated with the idea of art. With plastic flowers, kitsch china figurines and gigantic stainless steel toy animals - his work looks like over sized furnishings - seems like he wanted to confuse art with decoration.
Seeks to efface the mental boundaries of art, he also distances himself away from the craftsmanship of the 'meaning' of art by employing numerous assistants and commissioning works from specialized factories.
JEFF KOONS SUPERCONTEMPORANEA
Book: Jeffs Koons Supercontemporanea. Edited by Francesso Bonami. Published 2006. Electa:Milan
Jeff Koons draws on the aesthetic (a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste, and with the creation and appreciation of beauty)of everyday objects by revisiting mass-produced consumer goods and toys, food and home appliances in a new version of Pop Art which created a true artistic revolution during the sixties.
In this period artists such as Andy Warhol, James Rosenquist, Robert Raushenberg and Roy Licthtenstein(to became only a few) , fused art and everyday life by using ordinary objects, popular icons and advertisements in their work. Their work embodied a critical attitude towards society being easily swayed by the media.
The period was distinguished by an exaggerated cult of appearances, aggressive media communications and a veracious consumer ethic.
This period also incorporated banality (predictably) and converted the everyday into art, Koon's work immediately appeared closely related to the art of Andy Warhol and this led to its being called "Neo-Pop".
So is this were I can talk about Koon's copying the past ideas and creations within art??
.......
In the eighties however, popular aesthetics immediately had further developments: it was no longer the result of the optimism of the post war period but part of a complex consumer culture driven by the unconscious and people's aspirations. (people's past/and future needs/and what they want to see influencing what they see?)) Koons testifies to a new collective mythology, a fabulous and innocent world driven by nostalgia and desire (Koons interview - his own thoughts support this).
.......
Artist movements of the seventies - this approach draws upon art movements of the seventies, such as Conceptual Art and Minimalism.
Questioning and inspired by cultural and social battles.
though not politicized and always concrete, many of Koon's work makes use of objects and images that embody metaphorical messages (Metaphor is the concept of understanding one thing in terms of another) that allude the art system itself.
Look towards French Artist Marcel Duchamp to compare his urinal and how his art was perceived before Koon's minimalist and very conceptual approach.
While Duchamp and Warhol remove the 'readymadeness' from its context and raises it to a different level, Koons chooses never to dissociate it entirely from the reality of which it is a part.
Jeff Koons draws on the aesthetic (a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste, and with the creation and appreciation of beauty)of everyday objects by revisiting mass-produced consumer goods and toys, food and home appliances in a new version of Pop Art which created a true artistic revolution during the sixties.
In this period artists such as Andy Warhol, James Rosenquist, Robert Raushenberg and Roy Licthtenstein(to became only a few) , fused art and everyday life by using ordinary objects, popular icons and advertisements in their work. Their work embodied a critical attitude towards society being easily swayed by the media.
The period was distinguished by an exaggerated cult of appearances, aggressive media communications and a veracious consumer ethic.
This period also incorporated banality (predictably) and converted the everyday into art, Koon's work immediately appeared closely related to the art of Andy Warhol and this led to its being called "Neo-Pop".
So is this were I can talk about Koon's copying the past ideas and creations within art??
.......
In the eighties however, popular aesthetics immediately had further developments: it was no longer the result of the optimism of the post war period but part of a complex consumer culture driven by the unconscious and people's aspirations. (people's past/and future needs/and what they want to see influencing what they see?)) Koons testifies to a new collective mythology, a fabulous and innocent world driven by nostalgia and desire (Koons interview - his own thoughts support this).
.......
Artist movements of the seventies - this approach draws upon art movements of the seventies, such as Conceptual Art and Minimalism.
Questioning and inspired by cultural and social battles.
though not politicized and always concrete, many of Koon's work makes use of objects and images that embody metaphorical messages (Metaphor is the concept of understanding one thing in terms of another) that allude the art system itself.
Look towards French Artist Marcel Duchamp to compare his urinal and how his art was perceived before Koon's minimalist and very conceptual approach.
While Duchamp and Warhol remove the 'readymadeness' from its context and raises it to a different level, Koons chooses never to dissociate it entirely from the reality of which it is a part.
Tuesday, 9 November 2010
Essense of Kitsch culture in Koons' work
‘Michael Jackson and Bubbles‘ (1998) by Jeff Koons, as displayed at Versailles
Kitsch is a form of art that is considered an inferior, tasteless copy of an extant style of art or a worthless imitation of art of recognised value. The concept is associated with the deliberate use of elements that may be thought of as cultural icons while making cheap mass-produced objects that are unoriginal.
Kitsch also refers to the types of art that are aesthetically deficient (whether or not being sentimental, glamorous, theatrical, or creative) and that make creative gestures which merely imitate the superficial appearances of art through repeated conventions and formulae. Excessive sentimentality often is associated with the term.
Within the period of the New Wave music - the age when fashion went in for increasingly bright hi-tech colours.
In a way Koons testifies to this world of back brushed hairstyles, metal ribbons, lace and ruffles and food that came in ever-more fanciful colours where kitsch culture reigned supreme.
The term kitsch is considered derogatory(meaning lessen), denoting works executed to pander to popular demand alone and purely for commercial purposes rather than works created as self-expression by an artist.
The term is generally reserved for unsubstantial and gaudy works that are calculated to have popular appeal and are considered pretentious and shallow rather than genuine artistic efforts.
The concept of kitsch is applied to artwork that was a response to the nineteenth century art with aesthetics that convey exaggerated sentimentality and melodrama, hence, kitsch art is closely associated with sentimental art.
cultural thoughts on exhibition
Jeff Koons’s controversial installation at Versailles, France
People up in arms about displaying American modern contemporary art in such a revered, historical space such as Versailles, a quintessentially French national and cultural symbol.
What people think about his exhibit
http://artobserved.com/2008/09/go-see-jeff-koonss-controversial-installation-at-versailles-france-through-december-14/
The New York Times headline reads At Versailles, an Invasion of American Art
Elaine Sciolino writes:
America has invaded the gilded chambers and sculpted gardens of the Château de Versailles in the form of an exhibition by the American superstar artist Jeff Koons. Versailles in recent years has displayed only a few select works of contemporary artists. The exhibition of 17 Koons sculptures marks the first time that the chateau built by Louis XIV has organized so ambitious a retrospective of one contemporary artist. The exhibit, which opened on Wednesday, will continue until Dec. 14
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/09/11/arts/design/20080911_KOONS_SLIDESHOW_index.html
His work remains largely veiled by mystery precisely because the artist rarely give himself away to criticize the colourful and superficial world he depicts.
Koons does not condemn the system but observes it, deconstructs it and plays with it creating his own rules.
The 'Pop' World no longer suggests fantasy (as in the sixties) but reality: middle class America has now attained a greater level of prosperity in which consumerism is the greatest common denominator.
------
In Alison Chernick's one-hour documentary about Jeff Koons she comments:
'I do find his approach opportunistic, taking Warhol's more astute and "observational" approach to pop culture - an approach that highlighted the rapidity and ubiquity of mass production - and perverting it through the obscene amounts of money and time spent "perfecting" otherwise disposable artifacts from American pop culture'.
'Koons has a uniquely American point of view, capturing the essence of pop culture and converting into pieces that are bright, colorful, and popular'.
'one of the more ridiculous manifestations of the already lazy and indulgent era of post-modernism'. - commenting on Koon's production process/ choice of materials
All of Koons' art enshrines elements of American pop culture in forms that are inert, gargantuan, and "perfect."
People up in arms about displaying American modern contemporary art in such a revered, historical space such as Versailles, a quintessentially French national and cultural symbol.
What people think about his exhibit
http://artobserved.com/2008/09/go-see-jeff-koonss-controversial-installation-at-versailles-france-through-december-14/
The New York Times headline reads At Versailles, an Invasion of American Art
Elaine Sciolino writes:
America has invaded the gilded chambers and sculpted gardens of the Château de Versailles in the form of an exhibition by the American superstar artist Jeff Koons. Versailles in recent years has displayed only a few select works of contemporary artists. The exhibition of 17 Koons sculptures marks the first time that the chateau built by Louis XIV has organized so ambitious a retrospective of one contemporary artist. The exhibit, which opened on Wednesday, will continue until Dec. 14
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/09/11/arts/design/20080911_KOONS_SLIDESHOW_index.html
His work remains largely veiled by mystery precisely because the artist rarely give himself away to criticize the colourful and superficial world he depicts.
Koons does not condemn the system but observes it, deconstructs it and plays with it creating his own rules.
The 'Pop' World no longer suggests fantasy (as in the sixties) but reality: middle class America has now attained a greater level of prosperity in which consumerism is the greatest common denominator.
------
In Alison Chernick's one-hour documentary about Jeff Koons she comments:
'I do find his approach opportunistic, taking Warhol's more astute and "observational" approach to pop culture - an approach that highlighted the rapidity and ubiquity of mass production - and perverting it through the obscene amounts of money and time spent "perfecting" otherwise disposable artifacts from American pop culture'.
'Koons has a uniquely American point of view, capturing the essence of pop culture and converting into pieces that are bright, colorful, and popular'.
'one of the more ridiculous manifestations of the already lazy and indulgent era of post-modernism'. - commenting on Koon's production process/ choice of materials
All of Koons' art enshrines elements of American pop culture in forms that are inert, gargantuan, and "perfect."
Bio, concepts, his thoughts
Jeff Koons (born 1955) is a controversial modern artist who lives and works in New York (USA). He became famous during the 1980 s for a series of inflatable flowers and toys, displays of brand new vacuum cleaners and a life-size ceramic sculpture of ‘Michael Jackson and Bubbles’ (the pop idol's favourite chimpanzee pet).
Koon's own biography traces a positive and optimist picture of the figure of an artist, as if this time was itself paradoxically integrated into the society it mirrored. He was born into a middle class family living in the suburbs, his creativity was encouraged by his parents sending him off to have art lessons at an early age. Right from the start of his career Koons preferred spectacular materials that made a strong visual impact (but were quite costly) - this was in the years when people were earning money and spending extravagantly.
Now how could Koons have reflect this in his art without embodying the same principal? Bronze, porcelain and stainless steel required highly complex production processes carried out in speicialist factories.
Koons transformed the banality of the ordinary into a captivating and vital necessity with his early inflatable animals and flowers, which celebrated the seduction of innocence and present home appliances as eroticized metaphors of innovation and well being.
He is quoted as saying that his work exploits ‘mass culture iconography’ (image writing) depiction in the images of a subject - in other words, that he uses images, materials and ideas from popular culture to make his art, and celebrates the ‘banality of middle-class taste’. (Predictable characteristics – knowing their reaction)
In an interview, Koons explained that his hope is "that viewers will become confident of their own judgment and taste ... I tried to remove bourgeois (common characteristic) guilt and shame in responding to banality ... I was telling the bourgeois (typical middle class) to embrace the thing that it likes. Don't divorce yourself from your true being, embrace it. Don't try to erase it because you're in some social standing now and you're ambitious and you're trying to become some upper class."
In his rejection of the distinction between low and high art, Koons is a typically ‘post-modern’ artist. ‘Post-modern art’ is a reaction to the 'consumerism’ that has been made possible by the fact that manufacturing of products, distribution and dissemination have become very cheap.
However, instead of criticizing the ordinariness and commonness of all these products, post-modern art just accepts them, and in Koons' case somehow both celebrates and ironicizes them. (make it big, apparent, in your face art)
Koon's own biography traces a positive and optimist picture of the figure of an artist, as if this time was itself paradoxically integrated into the society it mirrored. He was born into a middle class family living in the suburbs, his creativity was encouraged by his parents sending him off to have art lessons at an early age. Right from the start of his career Koons preferred spectacular materials that made a strong visual impact (but were quite costly) - this was in the years when people were earning money and spending extravagantly.
Now how could Koons have reflect this in his art without embodying the same principal? Bronze, porcelain and stainless steel required highly complex production processes carried out in speicialist factories.
Koons transformed the banality of the ordinary into a captivating and vital necessity with his early inflatable animals and flowers, which celebrated the seduction of innocence and present home appliances as eroticized metaphors of innovation and well being.
He is quoted as saying that his work exploits ‘mass culture iconography’ (image writing) depiction in the images of a subject - in other words, that he uses images, materials and ideas from popular culture to make his art, and celebrates the ‘banality of middle-class taste’. (Predictable characteristics – knowing their reaction)
In an interview, Koons explained that his hope is "that viewers will become confident of their own judgment and taste ... I tried to remove bourgeois (common characteristic) guilt and shame in responding to banality ... I was telling the bourgeois (typical middle class) to embrace the thing that it likes. Don't divorce yourself from your true being, embrace it. Don't try to erase it because you're in some social standing now and you're ambitious and you're trying to become some upper class."
In his rejection of the distinction between low and high art, Koons is a typically ‘post-modern’ artist. ‘Post-modern art’ is a reaction to the 'consumerism’ that has been made possible by the fact that manufacturing of products, distribution and dissemination have become very cheap.
However, instead of criticizing the ordinariness and commonness of all these products, post-modern art just accepts them, and in Koons' case somehow both celebrates and ironicizes them. (make it big, apparent, in your face art)
Postmodern Representations
Harvey Brown, Richard. (1995). POSTMODERN REPRESENTATIONS - Truth, Power, and Mimesis in the Human Sciences and Public Culture. University of Illinois Press: Urbana and Chicago
Section: Postmodern Representation, Postmodern Affirmation
Page 4 Line 25 - 31
Lyotard (1988, 302) suggests, "The real political task today, at least insofar as it is also concerned with the cultural ...is to carry forward the resistance that writing offers to established thought, to what has already been done, to what everyone thinks, to what is well known to what is widely recognized, to what is 'readable', to everything which can change its form and make itself acceptable to opinion in general... The name most often given to this is postmodernism."
Harvey states (Page 13, Lines 15 - 17) In deploying the dialectics of irony, in seeing the irony or in being ironic, we take more seriously the deep ambiguities of all representations, all quests, all truths.
Page 14 Lines 18 -35
Harvey: talking on people's judgement, what is right?
'The practise of such open discourse encourages us to put our own cherished views at risk and recognise the rationality and humanity of people whose ideas and values may be radically different from our own. we also are encouraged to recognise the paradoxical nature of our own pursuit - that the truth (or justice, etc.) that we seek is shaped in our own quest to discover it. This realization of truth in discourse seems to require that we posit Truth outside of discourse itself. To figuratively manifest truth we take it to be literally existent.'
He believes this is largely because the creation of truths locally, historically and provisionally responds to particular needs that the concept of one universal Truth seeks to unify the interest of cognitive and social order.
...
CONSTRUCTION OF REALISM WITHIN CONCEPTS
Section: Realism and Power in Aesthetic Representation
Page 137 Line 24 - 28
Roland Barthes wrote, "Realism...cannot be a copy of things, but the knowledge of language; the most 'realistic' work is not that which 'paints' reality, but which... explores as deeply as possible the unreal reality of language" within a given genre (Barthes 1964, 165, my translation)
Barthes, Roland. 1964. 2La literature, aujord'hui". In Essais Critiques. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
...
CONSTRUCTION OF REALISM WITHIN CONCEPTS
"the recognition of realism depends conventionally precisely on fidelity to a given mode of representation or repetition" (Heath 1986, 144)
Heath, Stephen. 1986. "Realism, Modernism and Language-Consciousness'. Pg 103-122 in Realism in European Literature, ed. Nicholas Boyle and Martin Swales. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Has Jeff Koons' work been copied/ reproduced...came from anywhere??
...
Section : The Historical Relatively of RealismHarvey, Pg 139, (in essay after quote put surname, publish date and page number - that is all :))
"A genre whose representations are literal and realistic for one public may been seen as metaphoric and imaginary by another"
He goes on...Consider, for example, how conceptions of realism have changed over the centuries for literary and pictorial representations. In both these Fields, those who adhere to older paradigms (The word paradigm (pronounced /ˈpærədaɪm/) has been used in linguistics and science to describe distinct concepts. Its Greek! ) call new modes of representation subjective, arbitrary, or decadent. They see the new modes as deformations of the old canons a rejection of verisimilitude Verisimilitude is the quality of realism in something (such as film, literature, the arts, etc).and realism. They insist that that established paradigm is the only one that yields realistic representations and, hence, that speaks the truth.
...
Harvey: Pg140. 'Some critics even banish from art those representations that do not fit the dominant canon.'
He goes on to say...Contemporary aesthetic conservatives now defend the modernist paradigms against the postmodernism, much as former conservatives once defined the modernist paradigm against postmodernism. For example, in the editorial of the first issue of The New Criterion, Hilton Kramer (1984a) rejected postmodernism as an "insidious assault on the mind" and called for a return to modernist criteria of representation and truth.
Arnold Hauser (1982, 725) put it, every work of art "is historically and aesthetically unique, tied to the instant of its creation, and... different from every other product of its genre. If it identifies with a prototype, it is no longer a work of art"
Hauser, Arnold. 1982. The Sociology of Art. Translated by Kenneth J. Northcott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Good quote by Jacques Derrida "A face may exist forever, even if the human race dies out, but knowledge of it doesn't go on without a subject there to do the knowing." (Poststructuralism 73:2002 Oxford University Press:Oxford Catherine Belsey)
Known as Deconstructionism.
So, art...to be art, it must be new, break new boundaries, be something better than what came before...postmodern??
.............
Development...compare Jeff Koons' thoughts with an another artist with similar or different thought or ideas about there own work.
The well known work of the Fountain by Marcel Duchamp is highly acclaimed but is it true art. The Photograph is an elegantly showed but clearly recognizable upturned urinal, signed 'R Mutt 1917'. All that remains of the original, which was never shown, is the photograph, signifier of a signifier, the image of a 'work' which involved no work at all, by the artist who did not exist. Much later Duchamp authorized a number of copes....so technically Duchamp didn't create this piece of work but was globalised for its concept and if one can use the word 'beauty'.
Thiery de Duve has argues that 'Duchamp's work in general, and Fountain in particular, mark a turning point in aesthetics.' (Catherine Belsey 86:2002)
'An object once used in conformance with the concept for which it was produced now finds new potentials uses in the stalls of the flea market' (flea market being society today). This can be supported by the involuntary homage to Marcel Duchamp's work - an object being given a new idea. (Bourriaud, 2002:29)
Saussure's diagram (you have a saved image) of the sign as a self contained oval, with a line across the middle dividing signifier from signified, might give the impression that each signifier brings its own inseparable single meaning. Deconstruction undoes this impression, pushes meaning towards undecidability, and in the process democratizes language.
Meaning, not only the meaning of 'art' but of 'democracy' itself for example are not individual or personal or subjective, since they emanate from language.
(Catherine Belsey 87:2002)
'Human rights are a uptopian aspiration and not, in most parts of the world a reality. But they motivate legally binding decisions' (Catherine Belsey 88:2002)
Could move and bring in hyperreality here! :)
Section: Postmodern Representation, Postmodern Affirmation
Page 4 Line 25 - 31
Lyotard (1988, 302) suggests, "The real political task today, at least insofar as it is also concerned with the cultural ...is to carry forward the resistance that writing offers to established thought, to what has already been done, to what everyone thinks, to what is well known to what is widely recognized, to what is 'readable', to everything which can change its form and make itself acceptable to opinion in general... The name most often given to this is postmodernism."
Harvey states (Page 13, Lines 15 - 17) In deploying the dialectics of irony, in seeing the irony or in being ironic, we take more seriously the deep ambiguities of all representations, all quests, all truths.
Page 14 Lines 18 -35
Harvey: talking on people's judgement, what is right?
'The practise of such open discourse encourages us to put our own cherished views at risk and recognise the rationality and humanity of people whose ideas and values may be radically different from our own. we also are encouraged to recognise the paradoxical nature of our own pursuit - that the truth (or justice, etc.) that we seek is shaped in our own quest to discover it. This realization of truth in discourse seems to require that we posit Truth outside of discourse itself. To figuratively manifest truth we take it to be literally existent.'
He believes this is largely because the creation of truths locally, historically and provisionally responds to particular needs that the concept of one universal Truth seeks to unify the interest of cognitive and social order.
...
CONSTRUCTION OF REALISM WITHIN CONCEPTS
Section: Realism and Power in Aesthetic Representation
Page 137 Line 24 - 28
Roland Barthes wrote, "Realism...cannot be a copy of things, but the knowledge of language; the most 'realistic' work is not that which 'paints' reality, but which... explores as deeply as possible the unreal reality of language" within a given genre (Barthes 1964, 165, my translation)
Barthes, Roland. 1964. 2La literature, aujord'hui". In Essais Critiques. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
...
CONSTRUCTION OF REALISM WITHIN CONCEPTS
"the recognition of realism depends conventionally precisely on fidelity to a given mode of representation or repetition" (Heath 1986, 144)
Heath, Stephen. 1986. "Realism, Modernism and Language-Consciousness'. Pg 103-122 in Realism in European Literature, ed. Nicholas Boyle and Martin Swales. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Has Jeff Koons' work been copied/ reproduced...came from anywhere??
...
Section : The Historical Relatively of RealismHarvey, Pg 139, (in essay after quote put surname, publish date and page number - that is all :))
"A genre whose representations are literal and realistic for one public may been seen as metaphoric and imaginary by another"
He goes on...Consider, for example, how conceptions of realism have changed over the centuries for literary and pictorial representations. In both these Fields, those who adhere to older paradigms (The word paradigm (pronounced /ˈpærədaɪm/) has been used in linguistics and science to describe distinct concepts. Its Greek! ) call new modes of representation subjective, arbitrary, or decadent. They see the new modes as deformations of the old canons a rejection of verisimilitude Verisimilitude is the quality of realism in something (such as film, literature, the arts, etc).and realism. They insist that that established paradigm is the only one that yields realistic representations and, hence, that speaks the truth.
...
Harvey: Pg140. 'Some critics even banish from art those representations that do not fit the dominant canon.'
He goes on to say...Contemporary aesthetic conservatives now defend the modernist paradigms against the postmodernism, much as former conservatives once defined the modernist paradigm against postmodernism. For example, in the editorial of the first issue of The New Criterion, Hilton Kramer (1984a) rejected postmodernism as an "insidious assault on the mind" and called for a return to modernist criteria of representation and truth.
Arnold Hauser (1982, 725) put it, every work of art "is historically and aesthetically unique, tied to the instant of its creation, and... different from every other product of its genre. If it identifies with a prototype, it is no longer a work of art"
Hauser, Arnold. 1982. The Sociology of Art. Translated by Kenneth J. Northcott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Good quote by Jacques Derrida "A face may exist forever, even if the human race dies out, but knowledge of it doesn't go on without a subject there to do the knowing." (Poststructuralism 73:2002 Oxford University Press:Oxford Catherine Belsey)
Known as Deconstructionism.
So, art...to be art, it must be new, break new boundaries, be something better than what came before...postmodern??
.............
Development...compare Jeff Koons' thoughts with an another artist with similar or different thought or ideas about there own work.
The well known work of the Fountain by Marcel Duchamp is highly acclaimed but is it true art. The Photograph is an elegantly showed but clearly recognizable upturned urinal, signed 'R Mutt 1917'. All that remains of the original, which was never shown, is the photograph, signifier of a signifier, the image of a 'work' which involved no work at all, by the artist who did not exist. Much later Duchamp authorized a number of copes....so technically Duchamp didn't create this piece of work but was globalised for its concept and if one can use the word 'beauty'.
Thiery de Duve has argues that 'Duchamp's work in general, and Fountain in particular, mark a turning point in aesthetics.' (Catherine Belsey 86:2002)
'An object once used in conformance with the concept for which it was produced now finds new potentials uses in the stalls of the flea market' (flea market being society today). This can be supported by the involuntary homage to Marcel Duchamp's work - an object being given a new idea. (Bourriaud, 2002:29)
Saussure's diagram (you have a saved image) of the sign as a self contained oval, with a line across the middle dividing signifier from signified, might give the impression that each signifier brings its own inseparable single meaning. Deconstruction undoes this impression, pushes meaning towards undecidability, and in the process democratizes language.
Meaning, not only the meaning of 'art' but of 'democracy' itself for example are not individual or personal or subjective, since they emanate from language.
(Catherine Belsey 87:2002)
'Human rights are a uptopian aspiration and not, in most parts of the world a reality. But they motivate legally binding decisions' (Catherine Belsey 88:2002)
Could move and bring in hyperreality here! :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)